Henry Kissinger is frequently described as “a man of great charm, wit, and intellect.”
Henry
Kissinger, a moral monster who exemplified the dark arts of immoral and amoral Realpolitik
while at the pinnacle of political power in the United States, is a living
reminder of why we established (several ad hoc and hybrid, as well as one
permanent) international criminal tribunals and need universal jurisdiction in
the quest for international criminal justice. If you’re not well acquainted
with the precise reasons why Kissinger is rightly referred to in some quarters as
a “war criminal” (although one could plausibly argue he is also guilty of
crimes against humanity and complicity in genocide, among other crimes), see the first and
still best summary of the particulars of this searing public indictment in
Christopher Hitchens’ The Trial of Henry Kissinger (Twelve, 2012; first edition, Verso, 2001, 2002 with new preface). I’ll provide more
thorough references in a future post, but for now see too the 1987 edition of Sideshow: Kissinger, Nixon, and the Destruction of Cambodia (Cooper Square
Press) and Gary J. Bass’ new book, The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissinger, and a Forgotten Genocide (Alfred A. Knopf, 2013). The following excerpt is from
the latter volume:
“Nixon and Kissinger bear responsibility for a significant complicity in the slaughter of the Bengalis. This overlooked episode deserves to be a defining part of their historical reputations. But although Nixon and Kissinger have hardly been neglected by history, this major incident has largely been whitewashed out of their legacy—and not by accident. Kissinger began telling demonstrable falsehoods about the administration’s record just two weeks into the crisis, and has not stopped distorting since.”
In 1971, West Pakistan’s genocidal campaign in East Pakistan caused at least 8 million East Bengalis to flee to India, taking refuge in nearby Indian states and prompting a humanitarian crisis the U.S. could no longer ignore. Yet the evil of genocide was not, it seems, sufficient: “Nixon bitterly said, ‘The Indians need—what they really need is a—’ Kissinger interjected, ‘They’re such bastards.’ Nixon finished his thought: ‘A mass famine.’”
“Nixon and Kissinger bear responsibility for a significant complicity in the slaughter of the Bengalis. This overlooked episode deserves to be a defining part of their historical reputations. But although Nixon and Kissinger have hardly been neglected by history, this major incident has largely been whitewashed out of their legacy—and not by accident. Kissinger began telling demonstrable falsehoods about the administration’s record just two weeks into the crisis, and has not stopped distorting since.”
In 1971, West Pakistan’s genocidal campaign in East Pakistan caused at least 8 million East Bengalis to flee to India, taking refuge in nearby Indian states and prompting a humanitarian crisis the U.S. could no longer ignore. Yet the evil of genocide was not, it seems, sufficient: “Nixon bitterly said, ‘The Indians need—what they really need is a—’ Kissinger interjected, ‘They’re such bastards.’ Nixon finished his thought: ‘A mass famine.’”
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home