“If no political party in the
modern sense, the Brissotins [also known as the ‘Girondists’] represented more
than a mere faction pursuing power or personal goals. Montagnard rhetoric has
often led modern historians to suppose they really adhered to a modérantisme or fédéralisme. They have been sometimes styled ‘the Revolution’s
right wing,’ the ‘party of businessmen and merchants.’ But if more tolerant of
different views than their Montagnard opponents, and defenders of economic and
personal freedom, they were not liberals or moderates. Rather, they were the
first to envisage tackling economic inequality and attempting to create a
fairer society by constitutional, legal, and nonviolent means, especially tax
and inheritance laws combined with financial assistance for society’s weakest.
The Revolution’s first republicans, they were also far more genuine republicans
and democrats than the Montagne, and the real framers of both versions of the
Declaration of Rights of 1789 and 1793. They were, in fact, the founders of the
modern human rights tradition, black emancipation, women’s rights, and modern
representative democracy, though some Montagards, it must be remembered, like
Desmoulins, Romme, and Cloots, were sincere democratic republicans too. Prime
defenders of the Revolution’s core values, Brissotins and Dantonists formed the
essential link connecting the Revolution to the Enlightenment in its radical,
secular, democratic form and thus the first organized champions of democratic,
rights-based, secular modernity.”—Jonathan Israel, Revolutionary Ideas: An
Intellectual History from The Rights of Man to Robespierre (Princeton University Press, 2014): 478
Image:Statue of the Marquis de
Condorcet, created by Jacques Perrin in 1894, destroyed in 1941, erected again
in 1991.
Ratio Juris is a great journal on jurisprudence and philosophy of law. But we have no connection to them, and they have no connection to us. Please read this clarification.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home