Michael Harrington: democratic socialist
Edward Michael ‘Mike’ Harrington, Jr. (February 24, 1928 – July 31, 1989) was an
American democratic socialist, writer, author of The Other America [1962], political activist, political theorist,
professor of political science, radio commentator and founding member of the
Democratic Socialists of America.”
* * *
“People
speak of socialism. We should speak of socialisms. There is an amnesia about
the socialist tradition that abandons entire definitions of that ideal made by
serious mass movements. [….] What is needed, if socialism is to find a new
relevance for the twenty-first century, is some sense of its enormous diversity
and complexity. [….]
It was no
accident that utopian socialism was rediscovered in the 1960s and had a
significant impact on important political movements in the West a century and a
half after it began. […..] Utopian socialism also took on a new incarnation in
‘African’ socialism. And it pointed toward a new history of the
nineteenth-century past in which the long-forgotten struggles of artisans
suddenly came to life because scholars now lived in the age of the computer.” —
Michael Harrington
* * *
The Atlantic (August 2000)
By Harold
Meyerson
“From the
mid-1950s through the late 1980s one of the high points of life on the American
left was a Michael Harrington speech. For thousands of listeners, in fact, a
Harrington speech marked the starting point of their own life on the left. Harrington
was a more accomplished and prolific writer than either Eugene Debs or Norman
Thomas, his two predecessors in the role of America’s pre-eminent socialist,
but like Debs and Thomas, he won the majority of his converts through the power
of the spoken word.
A Harrington
speech was both a tour de force and a tour de horizon—an argument, invariably,
for the moral vision and practical advantages of democratic socialism, tailored
to the causes and controversies of the moment, buttressed by a scholarly consideration
of social trends and statistics, strengthened by Harrington’s habit of
entertaining opposing arguments before dispatching them. He provided listeners
with something that was none too easy to find elsewhere on the left: a sense of
historical context, of how their own activism fit into a larger pattern they
might otherwise have trouble discerning, of where they stood, broadly speaking,
in the flow of history. And he provided them with one thing more: an
overwhelming sense of the moral urgency that underlay his critique of
capitalism.” [….] Please see the entire article here.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home